Skip to content

Fines, Penalties & Forfeitures

April 2018 — Question 66

A broker unknowingly employs a convicted felon and 1 year after employment discovers the existence of such a conviction. Which penalty action listed below would not lie?

Why this answer

Under 19 U.S.C. 1641 and the broker penalty guidelines accompanying part 171 as tested, a broker who unknowingly employs a convicted felon faces a graduated scheme: seeking the Secretary's approval within 30 days of discovering the conviction avoids any penalty; seeking it later draws $5,000; failing to seek approval until Customs itself uncovers the violation draws $25,000; and continuing the employment after approval is denied draws $30,000. A $10,000 penalty appears nowhere in that schedule, so option C describes a penalty action that would not lie. Option D tempts because it states the correct consequence for exactly the same conduct. Watch for: Marking the $25,000 figure wrong because it seems harsh, when $10,000 is the amount the guidelines never use.

Original CBLE Simulator explanation — the question and key above are CBP's; this analysis is ours. Verify against the current edition before relying on it in practice.

CBP's cited authority

§ 19 CFR 171§ VII. Section 1641(d)(1)(e)

Answer and citations as published in CBP's official answer key for the April 2018 examination.

Reading answers is easy. The exam is 80 of these in 4.5 hours.

Pass rates run 12–30%. Find out in 15 minutes whether you'd clear the 75% line today — free, no signup.