Skip to content

Free Trade Agreements

October 2023 — Question 55

Which statement about the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) is FALSE?

Why this answer

The USMCA rules of origin in the cited general note include a provision specifically addressing goods put up in sets for retail sale under the tariff schedule's general rules of interpretation, including textile and apparel sets: a set is originating if every good in it is originating, or if the total value of the nonoriginating goods does not exceed ten percent of the value of the set. Statements B, C, and D each track that rule, since a set whose nonoriginating content exceeds twenty percent necessarily exceeds the ten percent allowance. Statement A is false because, unlike NAFTA, the USMCA did add special origination treatment for retail sets, so claiming none exists misstates the agreement. Watch for: Assuming USMCA simply carried NAFTA forward and missing the new retail-set origination provisions.

Original CBLE Simulator explanation — the question and key above are CBP's; this analysis is ours. Verify against the current edition before relying on it in practice.

CBP's cited authority

§ HTSUS General Note 11(i)

Answer and citations as published in CBP's official answer key for the October 2023 examination.

Reading answers is easy. The exam is 80 of these in 4.5 hours.

Pass rates run 12–30%. Find out in 15 minutes whether you'd clear the 75% line today — free, no signup.